
http://www.reddit.com/r/Homebrewing/com ... alexander/
Way to go Chris.KMcK wrote:Way to go, Chalmers! Maybe Dave Carroll will write a song about you and Alexander Keith. .
I'm actually impressed that the conversation didn't degrade into "some people have too much time on their hands" like it did elsewhere. Cool to see someone also posted Craig's article.RubberToe wrote:Someone posted the CH article to Reddit .
http://www.reddit.com/r/Homebrewing/com ... alexander/
Someone should inform him that life's hard.benwedge wrote:I've received a spy report that someone at the Fickle Frog who apparently works for Keith's Marketing Dept was loudly bemoaning us last night. Success? (Also, the spy suggested the man was made at me or KMcK, but when I pressed for more the guy was apparently mad at "all the brewnosers stirring shit up about the recipe.") We've made it, or something like that.
Not to mention the Dal archives announced weeks before they opened the archive what would, or at least could, be available. They had ample opportunity to stop it - and didn't.mr x wrote:lmfao. Maybe the marketing department should go back to school (if they were ever there in the first place). That was fucking lazy, plain and simple. And just maybe the peons are mad at having to endure a dressing down from Wade K. lmfao, that would be degrading to say the least. I think I'd change my name and leave the country.
Note to inbev marketing monkeys - if you'd come out and tell the truth about your 'secret original recipe', you'd at least have some respect for having an ounce of integrity. Unless original means something new since I left school, modern Keith's has serious deviations from the 'original' recipe. You have no idea how many people saw those documents at the Killam archive....
And here's another little nugget regarding 'secret' documents. They are only as secure as your lowest paid or most disgruntled employee.
That is one hilarious aspect I never thought of. They had to search the internet to find somebody who knew how to brew an India Pale Ale. Some selection of brewmasters, lmfao...KMcK wrote:This presents an opportunity to us to brew the Amarillo IPA recipe (giving credit, of course, to Eric Swedberg) and set it out for comparison to Keith's. We can now say that even Oland's/Labatt/Inbev/MomCorp admits that this is what an IPA is supposed to be like. We'd have to do it quickly to (e.g. tomorrow) to keep the media's attention. Anyone interested? This could be fun.
LMAO! Stirring shit up? Their marketing department should of used some f'ing brains before they aired that garbage! Looks good on em!benwedge wrote:I've received a spy report that someone at the Fickle Frog who apparently works for Keith's Marketing Dept was loudly bemoaning us last night. Success? (Also, the spy suggested the man was made at me or KMcK, but when I pressed for more the guy was apparently mad at "all the brewnosers stirring shit up about the recipe.") We've made it, or something like that.
The point is not that they tried to pass off someone elses recipe as their original(stupid as that was), but that they are trying to pass off what they are now brewing as the original recipe. If someone has gleaned that from the records, then that is what should be brewed for a comparison....followed up by records of how, where it was obtained. It was after all, a matter of public historical record, altho ignored till now.KMcK wrote:This presents an opportunity to us to brew the Amarillo IPA recipe (giving credit, of course, to Eric Swedberg) and set it out for comparison to Keith's. We can now say that even Oland's/Labatt/Inbev/MomCorp admits that this is what an IPA is supposed to be like. We'd have to do it quickly to (e.g. tomorrow) to keep the media's attention. Anyone interested? This could be fun.
Yes, the point of this incident is that they represented someone else's recipe as their own. We've already done the brew their original recipe thing and gotten their attention, but the current incident is a much more serious legal (and embarrassing) matter.Stusbrews wrote:The point is not that they tried to pass off someone elses recipe as their original(stupid as that was), but that they are trying to pass off what they are now brewing as the original recipe. If someone has gleaned that from the records, then that is what should be brewed for a comparison....followed up by records of how, where it was obtained. It was after all, a matter of public historical record, altho ignored till now.KMcK wrote:This presents an opportunity to us to brew the Amarillo IPA recipe (giving credit, of course, to Eric Swedberg) and set it out for comparison to Keith's. We can now say that even Oland's/Labatt/Inbev/MomCorp admits that this is what an IPA is supposed to be like. We'd have to do it quickly to (e.g. tomorrow) to keep the media's attention. Anyone interested? This could be fun.
Whatever the outcome, Im sure alexander kieth would not be proud of what is now being brewed in his name. Maybe we could fix that....
mr x wrote:We should send a gift pack over to Agricola Street. One Brewnosers glass, t-shirt, a few IPA's from Premiere, and a copy of How to Brew.![]()
![]()
KMcK wrote:Yes, the point of this incident is that they represented someone else's recipe as their own. We've already done the brew their original recipe thing and gotten their attention, but the current incident is a much more serious legal (and embarrassing) matter.Stusbrews wrote:The point is not that they tried to pass off someone elses recipe as their original(stupid as that was), but that they are trying to pass off what they are now brewing as the original recipe. If someone has gleaned that from the records, then that is what should be brewed for a comparison....followed up by records of how, where it was obtained. It was after all, a matter of public historical record, altho ignored till now.KMcK wrote:This presents an opportunity to us to brew the Amarillo IPA recipe (giving credit, of course, to Eric Swedberg) and set it out for comparison to Keith's. We can now say that even Oland's/Labatt/Inbev/MomCorp admits that this is what an IPA is supposed to be like. We'd have to do it quickly to (e.g. tomorrow) to keep the media's attention. Anyone interested? This could be fun.
Whatever the outcome, Im sure alexander kieth would not be proud of what is now being brewed in his name. Maybe we could fix that....
LMAO!mr x wrote:We should send a gift pack over to Agricola Street. One Brewnosers glass, t-shirt, a few IPA's from Premiere, and a copy of How to Brew.![]()
![]()
Any written work is subject to copyright law. They violated Eric Swedberg's rights by copying his recipe.LiverDance wrote:I'm no lawyer but I doubt it's a serious legal matter, you can't copyright recipes. It could have been the recipe for pliney the elder up there and it wouldn't make a difference. Maybe it was the brewmasters cry for help trying to show that he wants to brew and actual IPA![]()
No they didn'tKMcK wrote:Any written work is subject to copyright law. They violated Eric Swedberg's rights by copying his recipe.LiverDance wrote:I'm no lawyer but I doubt it's a serious legal matter, you can't copyright recipes. It could have been the recipe for pliney the elder up there and it wouldn't make a difference. Maybe it was the brewmasters cry for help trying to show that he wants to brew and actual IPA![]()
Did the commercial not show the method? I didn't see it. Including the method would make it copyright-able.LiverDance wrote:No they didn'tKMcK wrote:Any written work is subject to copyright law. They violated Eric Swedberg's rights by copying his recipe.LiverDance wrote:I'm no lawyer but I doubt it's a serious legal matter, you can't copyright recipes. It could have been the recipe for pliney the elder up there and it wouldn't make a difference. Maybe it was the brewmasters cry for help trying to show that he wants to brew and actual IPA![]()
Please read:
http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and who says it's Eric's recipe to begin with, just because he submitted it doesn't make it his.
(Emphasis mine)How do I protect my recipe?
A mere listing of ingredients is not protected under copyright law. However, where a recipe or formula is accompanied by substantial literary expression in the form of an explanation or directions, or when there is a collection of recipes as in a cookbook, there may be a basis for copyright protection. Note that if you have secret ingredients to a recipe that you do not wish to be revealed, you should not submit your recipe for registration, because applications and deposit copies are public records. See FL 122, Recipes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests