Page 1 of 2

Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:35 pm
by nsflatlander
Hello,

For the time being all my posts will start with the comment, "I'm a newbie". I've done a few Festa brews and one extract, with good results. I'm looking to make the jump to all grain, and was wondering if I could get some suggestions on what I should be looking for in an outdoor burner. I plan to do this in an outdoor building (size of a garage). I'd like to stick to 5 gallon batches max, and would like to start with a fairly simple (cost effective) setup while I continue to learn. Are the propane lobster boilers from a hardware stores all I need, or would it make sense to spend a bit more and get something more suited to brewing?

Thank you.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:18 pm
by LiverDance
Most of us use the ones from the Hardware stores and they work great. Try and find the highest btu one you can.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:02 pm
by nsflatlander
Thanks Liverdance. I haven't actually looked, I'll have a look next week, but how high is high? I see this one says 60,000 BTUs http://www.canadiantire.ca/AST/browse/2 ... ?locale=en is that a good bet?

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:22 pm
by CorneliusAlphonse
That's about the right strength. Some places have one listed at 72000, not sure if it would be noticeably better or now

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:08 pm
by LiverDance
nsflatlander wrote:Thanks Liverdance. I haven't actually looked, I'll have a look next week, but how high is high? I see this one says 60,000 BTUs http://www.canadiantire.ca/AST/browse/2 ... ?locale=en is that a good bet?
I have a unit very similar to that one and I found I had to raise the burner up a bit so it was closer to the kettle bottom. But 60,000 on that unit is very good. Like Liam mentioned the most i've seen around here is 72,000 from the big box stores. That one is also a very good price, probably $15 cheaper than the kent ones.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:32 pm
by nsflatlander
Thanks for the help. Is the fact that you had to raise the burner so that you can get the water to a certain temp higher and/or faster? or is there something else I'm missing? Btw, I love your signature. So so true.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:46 pm
by CorneliusAlphonse
The burner on that unit is just a bit low - the flames don't direct all their heat at the pot, a lot escapes up the sides.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:53 am
by BrooklandBrewer
My 2 cents (even though they are phasing out the penny)...these are definitely decent burners to start with. As the guys previously said, these burners don't direct the flames directly at the pot all of the time and hence are not very efficient. Maybe I've been using a lemon, but the burner I used deteriorated pretty quickly to only burn on one side of the pot. Another big problem was the black carbon that accumulated on the pot during the boil (super messy). If you can get one of these for a good price then it's a good place to start. If you don't mind spending more to get a better burner that you will have for a long time, I would recommend the Blichmann burner. I bought one of these from Noble Grape. Expensive yes (over $200 with leg extension kit) but well worth it after working with the other one for a short time. No carbon build up and super efficient/powerful burner. It can also be used for much bigger batches than 5 gallons. Here's a video that explains how it works. Hope that helps! :cheers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80DXdiSVxQI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:05 pm
by nsflatlander
Thanks BrooklandBrewer, I'll definitely keep that in mind before I make the final decision.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:26 pm
by mattvincent24
http://www.canadiantire.ca/AST/browse/2 ... ?locale=en" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is the burner i have and i love it. It was recommened to me by my father inlaw who uses it for lobster and crab boils. I used one that came with a turkey fryer and it was horrible. It was inefficient and blackened my pots with soot. This one on the other hand is much more efficient, has nice blue flame, easy to adjust and doesn't mess up my pots. Try it out you won't be disappointed.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:12 pm
by RubberToe
Here's the 72k BTU burner from Kent that many people swear by.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:34 pm
by gm-
I have one very similar to the Masterchef one, there is definitely some heat escape along the sites, but I partly solved that by putting two bricks under the burner to raise it a bit. Not encountered any soot problems with it.

Here is a pic of it in action
Image

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:01 pm
by weir
Soot is going to happen when the fuel mixture is too rich in the flame (fuel to air ratio is too high). You should be able to adjust your your regulator down a touch to a cleaner flame, if you're using propane it should be blue at the to and clear at the bottom, any yellow and it's a dirty burn with too much fuel.

That said, the amount of energy in the flame (btu's) will reduce if you do this, but the cleaner flame will burn hotter and heat your pot more efficiently and use less propane. So fewer BTU's, but it should heat just as we'll or better.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:14 pm
by sleepyjamie
I don't get any soot with my blichman

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:59 pm
by weir
sleepyjamie wrote:I don't get any soot with my blichman
The Blichmann regulator is likely properly adjusted to match the air mixture at the orifice, at least I would hope it is for the price.

A cheapo burner from a hardware store would just be designed to let out as much gas as it can possibly burn at atmospheric pressure in order to jack their advertised BTU rating on the box and make people buy brand x over brand y because one number is higher than the other. Cheap BBQ manufacturers are bad for doing the same thing.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:33 am
by sleepyjamie
weir wrote:
sleepyjamie wrote:I don't get any soot with my blichman
The Blichmann regulator is likely properly adjusted to match the air mixture at the orifice, at least I would hope it is for the price.

A cheapo burner from a hardware store would just be designed to let out as much gas as it can possibly burn at atmospheric pressure in order to jack their advertised BTU rating on the box and make people buy brand x over brand y because one number is higher than the other. Cheap BBQ manufacturers are bad for doing the same thing.
yeah your probably right. i also find the blichman heat is more evenly distributed.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:25 am
by mr x
Some flashing /heat shield up the sides would make a dramatic improvement in heat efficiency.

Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:09 pm
by LTownLiquorPig
http://www.walmart.ca/en/ip/fry-and-boi ... rkey+fryer" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This guys been "rolled back" at Walmart, in Greenwood at least. Wish I hadn't just bought a burner......

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:21 pm
by Dirt Chicken
If you want a toy, go to Canadiantire or wallymart. But if you want a serious burner, check these guys out. I believe that there are some restrictions with importing certain regulators from America if the regulator is shipped with the Burner. What you can do with purchase the burner separately, then order a 40 PSI regulator from the same vendor. Bottom line is that 220,000 BTU's is much better than 70,000 BTU's. I'm pretty sure that CSA only approves burners up to 70,000 BTU's for home use

http://www.bayouclassicdepot.com/propane_burner.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sent from my SGH-T989D using Tapatalk 2

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:24 pm
by Dirt Chicken
uploadfromtaptalk1362162349811.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1362162328142.jpg
Sent from my SGH-T989D using Tapatalk 2

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:30 pm
by Jimmy
Once again - I'll recommend these guys for burners online; I purchased the burners for my stand from them...good prices, the brokerage/duty is paid upfront so there are no unexpected fees upon delivery.

http://www.wayfair.com/Bayou-Classic-C4 ... ic&rtype=6" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

With that being said, by the time you pay shipping, duty, etc., you're nearing the Blichmann pricing.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:52 pm
by Dirt Chicken
Also wanted to add to my note that i have no problems bringing a 12gal batch to boil after sparge in roughly 16minutes in my keggle which is very nice, just saying

Sent from my SGH-T989D using Tapatalk 2

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:37 pm
by jeffsmith
Hopdawgs.ca sells the Bayou Classic burners now as well:

http://hopdawgs.ca/Equipment/Gas-burners" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Been thinking about grabbing one of the KAB6 burners myself.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:43 pm
by Jimmy
jeffsmith wrote:Hopdawgs.ca sells the Bayou Classic burners now as well:

http://hopdawgs.ca/Equipment/Gas-burners" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Been thinking about grabbing one of the KAB6 burners myself.
Did you add that to your cart to see what the total with shipping was?

The reason I'm asking is because NG stocks the Blichmann for $169 - I'm thinking you would be paying pretty much the same. By the looks of it, the burners are the same but you're getting stainless with the Blichmann, along with the ability to add legs. Not saying one is better than the other, I just know I'd prefer stainless if I'm paying the same amount.

Re: Burner Suggestions

Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:50 pm
by jeffsmith
Good point, hadn't considered that. I think if I were to get the Blichmann, I'd definitely get the leg extensions, but price would probably still end up being pretty similar to what I'd pay buying from hopdawgs.