uvintns.ca

General beer chit chat
Post Reply
User avatar
mr x
Mod Award Winner
Mod Award Winner
Posts: 13764
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:30 pm
Location: Halifax/New Glasgow

uvintns.ca

Post by mr x » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:04 pm

Worth taking a look at.

http://uvintns.ca/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
At Alexander Keith's we follow the recipes first developed by the great brewmaster to the absolute letter. :wtf:

User avatar
mr x
Mod Award Winner
Mod Award Winner
Posts: 13764
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:30 pm
Location: Halifax/New Glasgow

Re: uvintns.ca

Post by mr x » Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:59 pm

I hope everybody takes the time to sign this. Do the politicians and the people behind them honestly think we are stupid enough to believe crap like this:
Mr. Speaker, this bill adds another procedural option, namely the possibility of a civil injunction, in the event that there is an anticipated or continuing violation of the Liquor Control Act or the regulations. It is a procedural change, not a substantive change. In other words, anything that was legal before is still legal and anything that was illegal before is still illegal.
Horseshit. Insert Graham Steele and Ross Landry's dirtbag faces below.

:finger: :guillotine:
At Alexander Keith's we follow the recipes first developed by the great brewmaster to the absolute letter. :wtf:

BobbyOK
Verified User
Verified User
Posts: 665
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:27 am

Re: uvintns.ca

Post by BobbyOK » Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:12 am

If my read on this is correct, we're basically setting up a situation where a crown corp is both a regulator and a competitor of local businesses, and is being given special preference in terms of acting on complaints from larger businesses that both compete with the small guys AND are landlords for many of the crown corps locations. Whether or not "anything that was legal before is still legal and anything that was illegal before is still illegal", it's the conflicts in the process that are the problem.

User avatar
benwedge
Verified User
Verified User
Posts: 957
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:22 pm
Name: Ben Wedge
Location: Halifax
Contact:

Re: uvintns.ca

Post by benwedge » Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:24 am

BobbyOK wrote:If my read on this is correct, we're basically setting up a situation where a crown corp is both a regulator and a competitor of local businesses, and is being given special preference in terms of acting on complaints from larger businesses that both compete with the small guys AND are landlords for many of the crown corps locations. Whether or not "anything that was legal before is still legal and anything that was illegal before is still illegal", it's the conflicts in the process that are the problem.
Exactly. Are they the regulator or the retailer of alcohol in this province? I firmly believe that if the provinces insist on retailing liquor themselves the retailer and the regulator should be entirely separate entities. Basically what I'm saying in regard to this is that Alcohol & Gaming should be in charge of enforcing the liquor control act, even at U-Vint stores and the like and the NSLC should concern themselves expressly with retailing booze prepared by commercial entities.
Brewing right now: whatever is going on tap at Stillwell in a few weeks.

User avatar
mr x
Mod Award Winner
Mod Award Winner
Posts: 13764
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:30 pm
Location: Halifax/New Glasgow

Re: uvintns.ca

Post by mr x » Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:00 pm

To me, it is also a shady end around where we now have created 'agents of the government' who will most likely have to answer to nobody but themselves for their actions. Very, very bad idea...I would dearly love to know the architects of this black hole.
At Alexander Keith's we follow the recipes first developed by the great brewmaster to the absolute letter. :wtf:

Post Reply

Return to “General Beer Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 3 guests